The World Press Freedom Index (WPFI) is an annual ranking of countries compiled and published by Reporters Without Borders, a French-based non-profit organisation. The ranking is based on different countries' press freedom records. In 2024, Bangladesh dropped two positions, ranking 165th out of 180 countries. The decline in the ranking indicates that the state of freedom for journalism, newspapers, and expression in Bangladesh is getting worse. Truly, nothing goes well here.

To me, as the days go by, the space for people to speak, press freedom, and the right to express opinions on television in Bangladesh is steadily shrinking.

Many journalists have been arrested using the Cyber Security Act, previously known as the Digital Security Act. We have witnessed journalists being handcuffed. This suppression is not limited to journalism; the broader area of freedom of expression is also under threat. Article 39 of our constitution guarantees the freedom of speech, expression, and the press. However, we have seen many Bauls (traditional folk singers) arrested and even jailed under the Cyber Security Act. Cartoonists have also been imprisoned, and tragically, many individuals have died in custody due to various reasons.

The democratic system in Bangladesh is fragile. The spirit of democracy is epitomised in the words of the famous French philosopher Voltaire: I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

Dissent is one of the principal tenets of democratic values. While democracy is essential for systematic governance, it encompasses much more than just governmental structure. At its core, democracy thrives on the tolerance and welcoming of dissent. However, we are witnessing a troubling trend of unilaterality in our society and parliament. Authoritarian systems have infiltrated various levels of government, state, and society, creating a pervasive culture of fear. People are increasingly afraid to speak out due to the risks of imprisonment, job loss, and stalled promotions. This atmosphere of fear and repression forces individuals to remain silent, enduring uncertainty and injustice to avoid repercussions.  This pervasive uncertainty and injustice force individuals to remain silent in fear of repercussions.

Amidst these challenges, The Mirror Asia (TMA) embarks on its journey in Bangladesh, where freedom of the press and expression are severely restricted. Operating a news outlet from abroad offers the significant advantage of having more freedom to speak out against these adversities. I hope the TMA will boldly address the issues we cannot, due to various restrictions and pressures.

Bangladesh is now drowning in rampant corruption, with public money being looted without bounds. Inequality is rising, and money laundering is alarmingly prevalent. Many Bangladeshis have acquired second homes in places like Singapore and Canada. Currently, there is no platform to effectively speak out against corruption.

Questions have also been raised about the transparency of Bangladesh Bank, as journalists were recently barred from entering the central bank. These are ominous signs. Consequently, as many issues cannot be discussed openly within Bangladesh, I request the TMA to reveal the truth courageously. However, to have a significant impact, the news portal must go beyond merely repeating issues already covered by local electronic and print media. Mirror Asia needs to provide unique, credible and in-depth reporting to truly resonate and make a difference.

I believe Mirror Asia will address issues that we cannot openly discuss while residing in Bangladesh due to the draconian laws. The effort will add an extra dimension to its significance. If Mirror Asia merely reiterates what we already know, it won't have much impact. We need them to speak boldly on the matters that we are unable to discuss openly. This is the true responsibility of journalism.

The government often misunderstands why journalists criticise and expose its mistakes. However, the first principle of journalism is acknowledging that all governments, worldwide, lie. All powerful institutions hide information from the public. The role of journalism is to uncover hidden information and reveal the truth to the public. Publishing this information is not meant to embarrass the government but to ensure that the government can recognise its mistakes and take corrective action.

The authoritarian government severely damages democratic values and stifles dissent. This atmosphere of fear has been effectively instilled in journalists, who are often considered foes of the government. We need to break out of this vicious circle. I believe Mirror Asia will add a new dimension to this effort. Unfortunately, most online news portals operating outside the country merely copy news published in local newspapers. I trust Mirror Asia will rise above these copy-paste practices. It will present authentic news and views. I expect it to engage in thorough investigative journalism.

The Pulitzer is the highest prize in journalism, much like the Nobel Prize in literature. Most Pulitzer Prizes are awarded for investigative reporting, often uncovering financial corruption or scandals. Notably, The Washington Post has won the most Pulitzer Prizes. I hope Mirror Asia will investigate significant scams and corruption while also focusing on pressing global issues such as the environment.

Additionally, the TMA should pay attention to critical social issues like child marriage and rising religious fundamentalism. The tragic killings of writers like Humayun Azad, Avijeet, and Dipan for their works highlight the risks of discussing these topics. Operating from outside the country, Mirror Asia will have the freedom to delve into these important issues.

It would be good if Mirror Asia emphasises investigative journalism, with a focus on climate change, the Sundarbans, and the rising temperatures in Dhaka city. This approach will ensure that the news portal stands out and makes a significant impact.

I wish them all the best. I wish them success. May The Mirror Asia win.

Ensuring the social safety of journalists involves more than just publishing news. It’s imperative to ensure timely salaries according to the wage board regulations. Moreover, offering additional benefits beyond the wage board's requirements is vital for their overall well-being and security. This holistic approach is essential for protecting journalists’ welfare within society.

When newspapers or TV stations generate good revenue, owners are prompt to pay salaries. However, during financial difficulties, they fire journalists. Unfortunately, this often leads to the dismissal of senior or highly-paid journalists who are replaced by younger, less expensive staff. Consequently, many talented journalists have relocated abroad or left journalism altogether for positions in NGOs. The safety and job security of journalists are intrinsically linked to the freedom of expression for the press and the public.

Therefore, those who will work with The Mirror Asia should receive a justified salary and allowance. A dignified wage should be paid to them, ensuring their financial stability and job satisfaction. Mirror Asia must strive for uniqueness by maintaining the highest content quality. This requires journalists and other staff to be creative and innovative. Consequently, it is essential to invest additional resources to hire a skilled and dedicated workforce. This is my expectation from Mirror Asia.

Many argue that within the next 50 years, traditional paper-based newspapers will become obsolete as media convergence is rapidly unfolding. This convergence entails the integration of various media forms, including television, newspapers, online platforms, audio, and video content, into a single platform, which could be the mobile phone. A significant challenge faced by newspapers, television networks, and online news portals is the increasing reliance of people on social media platforms like Facebook for news consumption. However, despite this trend, people's trust ultimately lies with mainstream newspapers. Unlike mainstream media, social media lacks a gatekeeping system. The mainstream media prioritises fact-checking and verification before publishing. This commitment to accuracy and credibility sets them apart from social media platforms, which are full of fake news and rumors. Anyone can post unverified information on social media. That’s why we need to get back to the mainstream media. Here, gatekeeping matters most. This competition will continue. Yet, credibility remains the cornerstone of attracting audiences back to mainstream media.

 Prof. Robayet Ferdous, University of Dhaka